🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers said the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to train its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He added it could also enable tech companies to “train on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.